Published
Social Enterprise Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth of Small Businesses in Nepal: The Role of Government Support, Entrepreneurial Networks and Innovation Capability
Published in July-Sept 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 3, 2026)

Keywords
Abstract
Small firms in emerging economies have a key role in job creation and value creation, but their potential for sustainable growth is dependent on the ecosystem of support that surrounds them. This article creates a conceptual model on how the social enterprise ecosystem affects the sustainable growth of small businesses in Nepal based on three constructs mentioned repeatedly in the literature: government support, entrepreneurial networks, and innovation capability. Through the synthesis of secondary literature sources – no interviews or other primary data collection occurred – on entrepreneurial ecosystem, social capital and networks, dynamic capabilities, absorptive capacity, and government support, together with Nepal-specific empirical evidence, the article proposes that the entrepreneurial networks and innovation capability act as proximate drivers of sustainable growth, while the government support is operating mainly indirectly, by strengthening networks and innovation capability rather than functioning as the proximate driver of growth in its own right. This is a proposition supported by recent Nepali survey evidence that shows that entrepreneurs in Nepal perceive government support as the least effective ecosystem factor, while entrepreneurial capability and socio-cultural support have shown significant positive effects on growth intentions. The article offers a conceptual model, five propositions, and discussion of theoretical and policy implications, thereby presenting the researcher with a testable model and policymakers with a better understanding of where investment in ecosystems will yield the most results in terms of small business growth in Nepal.
References
- [1]Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O'Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 1–10.
- [2]Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Ballinger.
- [3]Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
- [4]Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.
- [5]Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030–1051.
- [6]Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95.
- [7]Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434.
- [8]Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2005). SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199–229.
- [9]Bozhikin, I. (2019). Social entrepreneurship ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Nauchni trudove (University of National and World Economy, Sofia), (5), 161–174.
- [10]Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
- [11]Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
- [12]Doh, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea. Research Policy, 43(9), 1557–1569.
- [13]Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.
- [14]Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
- [15]Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
- [16]Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209–229.
- [17]Gupta, P., & Srivastava, R. (2024). Research on social enterprises from an emerging economy: Systematic literature review and future research directions. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 458–493.
- [18]Hussain, A., Ahmad, S. A., & Mia, M. S. (2023). A systematic literature review on performance of social enterprises. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), Article 2269738.
- [19]Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.
- [20]Klimas, P., & Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2022). Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Do they fit? Problemy Zarządzania – Management Issues, 20(1(95)), 43–66.
- [21]Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12(3), e12359.
- [22]O'Shaughnessy, M., & Olmedo, L. (2023). Placing Irish social enterprise ecosystem within the wider European landscape. Irish Journal of Management, 42(1), 3–15.
- [23]Prajapati, B., & Khanal, K. (2023). Empowering entrepreneurs: Exploring the role of ecosystem factors in driving growth intentions in Nepal. Gomal University Journal of Research, 39(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-02-01
- [24]Prasannath, V., Adhikari, R. P., Gronum, S., & Miles, M. P. (2024). Impact of government support policies on entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(3), 1533–1595.
- [25]Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.
- [26]Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.
- [27]Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, & J. Heinonen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of entrepreneurship and small business (pp. 407–421). Sage.
- [28]Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
- [29]Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
- [30]Zaato, S. G., Ismail, M., Uthamaputhran, S., & Owusu-Ansah, W. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on SMEs performance in Ghana: The role of social capital and government support policies. Jurnal Manajemen dan Wirausaha, 22(2), 99–114.
- [31]Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
Authors (1)
Min Tamang
CECOS College London, Edmonton...CECOS College London, Edmonton Green, London, Unit...CECOS College London, Edmonton Green, London, United KingdomCECOS College London, Edmonton Green, London, United Kingdom
View all publications →Download Article
Summarise this paper with AI:
Article Information
Published in:
July-Sept 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 3, 2026)Article Impact
Views:12
Downloads:18
How to Cite
Tamang, M. (2026). Social Enterprise Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth of Small Businesses in Nepal: The Role of Government Support, Entrepreneurial Networks and Innovation Capability. International Journal of Management and Sustainability Practices, 1(3), 97 - 104. https://ijmsp.com/articles/IJMSP310004
Article Actions
More from this Issue
Analyzing Utility Model Protection of Certain Technologies towards Waste Management Solutions in Developing Countries
Sakshi Kothari, Prateek S...Read more →
Behavioral Biases and Investment Decision-Making: The Mediating Role of Trust in AI and the Moderating Role of Financial and Digital Financial Literacy: A Narrative Literature Review
Rahul Negi, Kaushal KumarRead more →
Technostress and Productivity in the Digital Workplace: A Narrative Review
Gauri Gupta, Ashok Kumar ...Read more →
