Skip to main content
chiefeditorijmsp@gmail.com
9410037805
e-ISSN: 3139-5449
International Journal of Management and Sustainability Practices

International Journal of Management and Sustainability Practices

Published

Beyond Purchase Intention: A Narrative Review of Perceived Benefits and Consumer Behaviour towards Electric Vehicles

Published in July-Sept, 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 3, 2026)

Beyond Purchase Intention: A Narrative Review of Perceived Benefits and Consumer Behaviour towards Electric Vehicles - Issue cover

Abstract

The transition toward electric mobility has generated a substantial body of research on the psychological, economic, and social forces that shape consumer behaviour toward electric vehicles (EVs). The majority of this literature, however, has concentrated on purchase intention as the principal outcome variable, leaving the subsequent stages of the consumer decision journey comparatively under-examined. This narrative review synthesises findings from a broad cross-section of peer-reviewed studies to map how perceived benefits, comprising environmental, economic, functional, hedonic, symbolic, and policy-related dimensions, translate into purchase intention and, more importantly, how intention subsequently unfolds into actual purchase behaviour, post-purchase satisfaction, continuance, and advocacy. Drawing on established behavioural frameworks, including the theory of planned behaviour, the technology acceptance model, the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and the value-belief-norm theory, the review identifies consistent evidence that environmental concern and financial value remain robust predictors of intention, while hedonic and symbolic benefits exert an increasingly influential role in maturing EV markets. The review further highlights an emerging and consequential stream of research documenting the intention-behaviour gap, whereby stated willingness to purchase an EV frequently fails to materialise into an actual transaction because of contextual constraints such as budget, charging access, and vehicle body-style preferences. Post-purchase constructs, including satisfaction, task-technology fit, and green self-identity, are shown to determine continuance intention and word-of-mouth behaviour among existing owners. The review concludes by identifying conceptual and methodological gaps, most notably the scarcity of longitudinal and behavioural, as opposed to self-reported, data, and offers directions for future research and policy design intended to convert positive perceptions into durable adoption behaviour.

References

  1. [1]Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Amini, M. H., & Langove, N. (2018). What make consumer sign up to PHEVs? Predicting Malaysian consumer behavior in adoption of PHEVs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.007
  2. [2]Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. [3]Bozpolat, C. (2024). Estimating the determinants of consumers' electric vehicle purchase intentions: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Current Research in Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1488966
  4. [4]Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., Tripathi, V., & Agnihotri, D. (2023). Exploring consumers' motives for electric vehicle adoption: Bridging the attitude–behavior gap. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(10), 4174–4192. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0618
  5. [5]Chen, P., Selamat, M. H., & Lee, S.-N. (2025). The impact of policy incentives on the purchase of electric vehicles by consumers in China's first-tier cities: Moderate-mediate analysis. Sustainability, 17(12), Article 5319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125319
  6. [6]Cruz-Jesus, F., Figueira-Alves, H., Tam, C., Pinto, D. C., Oliveira, T., & Venkatesh, V. (2023). Pragmatic and idealistic reasons: What drives electric vehicle drivers' satisfaction and continuance intention? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, Article 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103626
  7. [7]Ding, Z., Jiang, X., Liu, Z., Long, R., Xu, Z., & Cao, Q. (2018). Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: A comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.013
  8. [8]Dong, X., Zhang, B., Wang, B., & Wang, Z. (2020). Urban households' purchase intentions for pure electric vehicles under subsidy contexts in China: Do cost factors matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 135, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.012
  9. [9]Fuller, J., Baxter, J., & Skimming, J. (2021). Social and municipal influences on intention to purchase electric and hybrid electric vehicles in London Ontario, CA. Canadian Planning Policy/Aménagement et politique au Canada, 2021, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.24908/CPP-APC.V2021I2.13928
  10. [10]Hassan, A., Mahmoud, M. A., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Ibrahim, M., & Albashrawi, M. A. (2026). Why aren't electric vehicles taking over? Exploring the drivers and barriers to adoption: A systematic review, theoretical framework, and future directions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Advance online publication. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369847826000720
  11. [11]Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600314
  12. [12]Hoang, T. T., Pham, H. T., & Vu, H. M. T. (2022). From intention to actual behavior to adopt battery electric vehicles: A systematic literature review. The Open Transportation Journal, 16, e187444782208100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1874447822000057
  13. [13]Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
  14. [14]Jaiswal, D., Kaushal, V., Kant, R., & Singh, P. K. (2021). Consumer adoption intention for electric vehicles: Insights and evidence from Indian sustainable transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, Article 121089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121089
  15. [15]Khurana, A., Kumar, V. V. R., & Sidhpuria, M. (2020). A study on the adoption of electric vehicles in India: The mediating role of attitude. Vision, 24(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919875548
  16. [16]Lin, B., & Shi, L. (2022). Identify and bridge the intention–behavior gap in new energy vehicles consumption: Based on a new measurement method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.015
  17. [17]Lin, B., & Wu, W. (2018). Why people want to buy electric vehicle: An empirical study in first-tier cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.026
  18. [18]Lv, Z., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., Wu, J., & Hou, M. (2024). Impact of perceived value, positive emotion, product coolness and Mianzi on new energy vehicle purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, Article 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103564
  19. [19]National Bureau of Economic Research. (2019). Assessing federal subsidies for purchases of electric vehicles. NBER Digest. https://www.nber.org/digest/jun19/assessing-federal-subsidies-purchases-electric-vehicles
  20. [20]Ooi, S. K., Xu, Y., & Yeap, J. A. L. (2025). Beyond the first charge: Understanding continuance intention among electric vehicle drivers in China. Case Studies on Transport Policy. Advance online publication. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221053952500135X
  21. [21]Poon, W. C., Sin, K. Y., & Sathasivam, K. (2024). An extended combined-TAM-TPB to explain the intention to adopt electric vehicles: A multi-group analysis of Generations X, Y, and Z [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4291137/v1
  22. [22]Rehman, S. U., Alshuaibi, M. S. I., Alshuaibi, A. S. I., Nguyen, N. T., Rumman, J. B. A., & Abdulmuhsin, A. A. (2026). Tech and green: Customer satisfaction leads electric vehicle purchase intention with the moderating role of innovativeness and barriers. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 20(4), 1088–1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2025-0032
  23. [23]Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010
  24. [24]Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
  25. [25]Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Lanzalonga, F., & Ferraris, A. (2022). Electric vehicles' consumer behaviours: Mapping the field and providing a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 150, 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.011
  26. [26]Shalender, K., & Sharma, N. (2021). Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00602-7
  27. [27]Sreen, N., Purbey, S., & Sadarangani, P. (2018). Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.002
  28. [28]Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. (2024). Study finds electric vehicle subsidies help the climate and automakers – but at a cost. Stanford Report. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/10/electric-vehicle-subsidies-help-the-climate-u-s-automakers
  29. [29]Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
  30. [30]Wang, D., Ozden, M., & Tsang, Y. P. (2023). The impact of facilitating conditions on electric vehicle adoption intention in China: An integrated unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231224715
  31. [31]Wang, L., Zhang, Q., & Wong, P. P. W. (2022). Purchase intention for green cars among Chinese millennials: Merging the value-attitude-behavior theory and theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 786292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786292
  32. [32]Wang, W., & Mohamed, M. (2025). Will users practice what they preach? Exploring the influencing factors of the intention behaviour gap in electric vehicles adoption. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 31, Article 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101424
  33. [33]Wang, X., Cao, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). The influences of incentive policy perceptions and consumer social attributes on battery electric vehicle purchase intentions. Energy Policy, 151, Article 112163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112163
  34. [34]Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
  35. [35]Xu, Y., Zhang, W., Bao, H., Zhang, S., & Xiang, Y. (2019). A SEM–neural network approach to predict customers' intention to purchase battery electric vehicles in China's Zhejiang province. Sustainability, 11(11), Article 3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113164
  36. [36]Yu, T., Teoh, A. P., Bian, Q., et al. (2025). What drives continuance intention to use electric vehicles: An extension of expectation-confirmation model. Transportation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10667-w
  37. [37]Zhang, K., Guo, H., Yao, G., Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2018). Modeling acceptance of electric vehicle sharing based on theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 10(12), Article 4686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124686
  38. [38]Zhao, H., Bai, R., Liu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). Exploring purchase intentions of new energy vehicles: Do "mianzi" and green peer influence matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 951132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951132

Authors (2)

Priya Nautiyal
ORCID

School of Management, Doon Uni...

View all publications →

H. C. Purohit

School of Management, Doon Uni...

View all publications →

Download Article

PDF

Best for printing and citation

File size: 0.7 MB
Format: PDF

Summarise this paper with AI:

Article Information

IJMSP310005

IJMSP-01-000029

105-112

2026-09-15

JATS XML

Article Impact

Views:80
Downloads:33

How to Cite

Nautiyal, P., & Purohit, H. C. (2026). Beyond Purchase Intention: A Narrative Review of Perceived Benefits and Consumer Behaviour towards Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Management and Sustainability Practices, 1(3), 105-112. https://ijmsp.com/articles/IJMSP310005

Article Actions

Whatsapp